who will win china or usa

Moreover, Beijing has built up its forces and road network on its border with India, and also constructed a series of bases in nearby countries to ‘envelop' India. The U.S. and China are going toe to toe in their fight over trade. Operationally, the PLA and U.S. military have very different needs. Scary vision of all-out war between China and the US. Join the discussion. This requires globe-spanning logistical capabilities including hundreds of transport planes, aerial refueling tankers to keep jet fighters and transports aloft, and amphibious transports and carriers to convey Marine units. Should the U.S. Navy succeed in engineering new, extremely sophisticated layered ship defenses with now-emerging weapons such as laser interceptors, drones and electronic warfare by 2030, Chinese attacks might be stopped. By any estimation, it would be the largest engagement the world has seen in just about 100 years, and like … Anil Ashar 04 August 2019. Beijing and Washington have profound—though fortunately not comprehensive—disagreements on matters of global governance. Japan counterattacks, sending in amphibious warships, submarines, surface warships and aircraft-backed Marines. Initially, by 2030 the Chinese Navy is likely much larger and potentially just as sophisticated as the U.S. Navy, or at least in a position to rival American technical supremacy. The force “out-ranging” the other with intelligence, search, and reconnaissance through aerial or surface drone sensors and sensor-enabled F-35s, might be likely to rule the day. The country with this advantage could potentially destroy large portions of the opposition military from space in the initial portions of any conflict. Fortunately, despite profoundly different political systems, China and the United States are not as intrinsically hostile to each other as were the West and the Soviet Union—in fact, they have a high degree of economic interdependence. If a war broke out between the United States and China, the clash between two of the world’s most powerful militaries would be horrific. US-China relations have deteriorated markedly since then, with President Trump slapping tariffs on the country to correct what he says have been years of one-sided trade agreements. Also, some kind of land-engagement, if on smaller swaths of terrain, would be expected due to amphibious assault. They will own it." In a championship … The United States has a massive arsenal in a nuclear ‘triad'. The U.S. is geographically isolated from its foes and instead depends on a massive network of overseas bases on six continents to engage or contain adversaries. Additionally, Beijing has only a few military alliances with Pakistan, North Korea, and a few southeast Asian nations. At the same time, the PLA also fields 500 Type 99 tanks which are in a similar ballpark to the very capable U.S. M1 Abrams. Democratic nominee Joe Biden would deal with Beijing in a "much more traditional" way if he wins the election, said Max Baucus, a former U.S. ambassador to China. China is also expanding its capacities for longer-range expeditionary operations befitting its status a superpower—particularly in Africa, where Chinese companies maintain a dominant and ever-growing presence. There are only 187 F-22s, and the F-35 that is supposed to be joining them is running into all sorts of problems in the test phase, including the hi-tech helmet that is supposed to put all kinds of info in the pilot's visor that doesn't work right yet. Several of these Asian countries, as well as western and central Europe, also rely upon U.S. military forces to meet their security needs. And China exports more to the United States than it imports from the United States (a fact that clearly riles up Trump and was a key instigator for the trade war). After more than two years of rising tension, the US and China have signed a deal aimed at calming trade frictions. However, if a more immediate or short-term objective evolved into full-scale war, major force-on-force land war might be unavoidable. (Personally, this author does not believe contemporary Japan will become an aggressive military power anytime soon, but the Chinese don't see it that way due to their bitter memories of Japanese invasion.) But, China is slowly developing multi-national institutions such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and its aspirational Silk Road project in hopes of fostering stronger ties. Interestingly, one of the wargame circumstances described in the Foreign Policy report involved a decision to “jam” or attack Chinese communications systems as opposed to pursuing a more kinetic or direct fire option. Click here to register. Others are following in its footsteps. China would have to completely capture the disputed territories and move into India to … America's massive military spending reflects its technology-oriented approach to warfare, a paradigm which seeks to send a drone or guided missile in place of a man (or woman) whenever possible—especially as every friendly casualty may result in a political firestorm. 1 Comments. Photo: Xinhuanet Mean… Who has more lower flying, faster, armed and better networked satellites? Therefore, the Pentagon prefers to develop comprehensive intelligence and communication capabilities to direct a few weapons systems with a high degree of precision. That does not work, according to the wargame scenario. (Reuters)History tells us that when a rising power meets a waning power, it leads to war. For example, the PLA musters 8,000 tanks—but 3,000 are 1950s-era Type 59 and Type 63 tanks. Chilling World War III 'wargames' show US forces crushed by Russia and China. The United States maintains more than twenty times the number of nuclear warheads that China does (1,350 compared to 45 deployed and 4,000 compared to 270 when including stockpiles, according to the Arms Control Association). Kris Osborn is defense editor for the National Interest. This is made up of ballistic missile submarines (which are basically so hard to hunt there is no way to stop them all); nuclear bombers (useful for signaling to an opponent the possibility of a nuclear attack, or for hitting mobile targets); and ground-based missile silos (the least flexible of the three, but these allow more targets to be hit and force an enemy to devote resources to attack them). Ryan Crane While America holds the current stealth jet lead with the only fielded fifth-generation fighter, Russia and China are both gunning for it. Given all of these factors, sheer force size in terms of numbers of ships, provided each had several hundred, might be less significant than the technical elements of the weapons themselves. The US could no longer win a war against China. Still, the balance of power between nations will likely play a role alongside diplomacy—a fleet that is never used in war may still prevent one, for example, by deterring possible opponents. China would have to get the bulk of its ground forces across the Himalayas as fast as possible, or the war would grind to a halt. Undersea war would also be decisive, as the country dominating below the surface would be in position for forward attack and clandestine reconnaissance missions. At least initially, it is likely that the U.S.-Japan alliance would attack with the more limited goal of liberating the island chain or at least repelling the Chinese presence from the contested area of the East China Sea. Despite all of this, the United States military still has vastly more recent combat experience, particularly in joint operations coordinating multiple services. Therefore, war between China and the U.S.-Japan alliance ensues. (Moscow has a similar stance, claiming it may use tactical nuclear weapons to ‘de-escalate' a conventional war.) The PLA and Peoples’ Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) have also concentrated on training a Special Forces and Marine branch suitable for more expeditionary operations. This area of war, it seems clear, would also expectedly hinge upon air power, because if U.S. stealth fighters and bombers were able to penetrate Chinese airspace and destroy land-fired weapons, then ship defenses would have a tremendous advantage as well. Right now, the outcome with that would seem extremely uncertain. Any halt to the Chinese advance would be a de facto win for India. ​. They also have reasons to mistrust each other. For example, see the century in between the defeat of Napoleon and World War I, during which there was no European-wide war. Starting in 2015, Chinese President Xi Jinping—who seems set to remain in power indefinitely—announced a major reform initiative to radically downsize PLA ground forces to improve their quality. This in contrast to fielding a larger, and cheaper, number of platforms which was typical in the past such as World War II. Sgt. International trade … Don't have an account? China is also an enthusiastic adopter of this doctrine and has arguably made greater strides in developing armed drones and advancing networking capabilities than Russia or various European countries. PLA ground and air forces still exhibit a wide range of quality, fielding both early Cold War systems and cutting-edge variants. China is only beginning to acquire such logistics and is situated in a very crowded neighborhood surrounded by potential military competitors such as India, Russia and Japan. However, China only spends slightly over one-third as much as the United States, accounting for thirteen percent of annual global military spending in 2017, compared to thirty-five percent by the United States according to SIPRI. "And let me tell you something: If he ever won, China will own the United States, OK? In a recent article in the journal Diplomacy and Statecraft, Rovner notes that most analysts, and apparently most soldiers, expect that a war between China … This reflects Washington's more aggressive nuclear posture, which holds that the U.S. has the right to launch a nuclear first strike in a conflict, even if it has only been attacked with conventional weapons. Who has better alternatives to GPS? US President Donald Trump once claimed that trade wars are ‘good and easy to win’, yet in his tussle with China the data appears to be proving him wrong By contrast, the U.S. military operates over two-thousand fourth-generation combat jets, increasingly being supplemented by fifth-generation stealth designs. And the United States could very well lose. Here's what one war game forecasted could happen. Who will win the China-US trade war? Ultimately, the country with the more advanced AI-enabled sensors, long-range weapons and surface-to-air-to-undersea networking would destroy the other. A ship, for example, may detect an attacking jet and pass the targeting data to a nearby fighter which can then use the telemetry to launch a missile without exposing itself by turning on its radar—or vice versa. This brings a potential advantage as the strategy would be to avoid a major, protracted ground war against China’s one-million strong, armored land Army. It is a market and a technology denial regime that seeks to win back manufacturing that the U.S. and European countries have lost to China. © Copyright 2020 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved, Air War: Stealth F-22 Raptor vs. F-14 Tomcat (That Iran Still Flies), A New Report Reveals Why There Won't Be Any 'New' F-22 Raptors, How an ‘Old’ F-15 Might Kill Russia’s New Stealth Fighter, according to the Arms Control Association. China today has the largest military on the planet, with two million active personnel in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). He also has a Masters Degree in Comparative Literature from Columbia University. A recent think tank wargame explores the prospect of a massive war between China and America and Japan in 2030, introducing many war-time questions about submarines, amphibious attack, surface ships and fifth-generation fighters. These newer U.S. planes theoretically enjoy a massive edge in long-range aerial combat and in penetrating enemy airspace. Both the U.S. and Chinese warships will be armed with massive, long-range attack weapons, so it would seem that the prevailing force would be that with the best and highest resolution sensors. However, China still retains tense relations with India, a country with a comparably huge population but only one-quarter of the gross domestic product, from which China seized Himalayan territory in a brief 1962 war. The winner of that engagement would be much better positioned to out-range and out-attack the opposing force. Furthermore, Chinese hackers have also proven reasonably adept at hacking into foreign computer systems and perpetrating industrial espionage, but Beijing has at least so far refrained from election-manipulation tactics practiced by its neighbor Russia. While some might scoff at the distinction—after all, doctrine does not prevent a country from launching a first strike if it wants to—the reality is that offensive and defensive nuclear warfare involve different force structures. Yet, the Chinese government is aware that the large size of its forces in part reflects an antiquated mid-twentieth century force structure emphasizing massive, low-quality ground armies. Today, the PLA is only beginning to implement a more joint-operations oriented doctrine while struggling to overcome the traditional parochialism of the military hierarchy, which occupies a prestigious place in its society. China, by contrast, has a defensive nuclear doctrine claiming it will only employ nukes if attacked with them first. Declaring a 50-mile exclusion zone around the Senkakus, Beijing deploys a ring of surface ships, submarines, warplanes, and drones—backed by ballistic missiles based on the Chinese mainland…”. China's economy is rebounding strongly China, … In one corner, President Donald Trump is swinging away with tariffs and blacklisting Huawei Technologies. It’s not clear anyone can win. Recommended: Air War: Stealth F-22 Raptor vs. F-14 Tomcat (That Iran Still Flies), Recommended: A New Report Reveals Why There Won't Be Any 'New' F-22 Raptors, Recommended: How an ‘Old’ F-15 Might Kill Russia’s New Stealth Fighter. Same would be true on the Chinese side, meaning the maritime force with the best defenses would most likely have an upper hand. According to research organization RAND, should a major conflict arise in Russia and China's 'backyards,' US … According to a story in Foreign Policy, the Center for New American Security’s wargame unfolds as follows: “…A Chinese flotilla lands 50 soldiers on Uotsuri Jima, an island in the East China Sea that is part of the Senkakus, an island chain owned by Japan but also claimed by China. In the event China attacked Taiwan, for instance, the United States could impose a trade embargo or go after China’s base in Djibouti and facilities in … Also, Aegis radar and other elements of the Navy’s ship-based layered defenses would determine whether Chinese land-fired anti-ship missiles were able to successfully destroy U.S. carriers and warships. Photo: US Air Force Tech. ... and “might struggle to win or perhaps lose, a war against China or Russia”. By 2030, satellite-fired weapons will likely be here, scalable lasers will bring unforeseen range both within and beyond the earth’s atmosphere and satellite sensor sophistication and weaponization would likely determine the victor. The two biggest powers in the world, China and the United States, are on a collision course. © Copyright 2020 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved. Beijing's non-interference and no-questions-asked approach to human rights and corruption issues have won it many friendly governments on the African continent. Posture for Intervention Abroad and Defense At Home. Osborn has also worked as an anchor and on-air military specialist at national TV networks. One thing is for sure: among the losers will be us. Please login to post a comment or reply. China now have a modern army.Correct Answer:First of all the US would win only if it was a military to military conflict. In the year 2016 China and the United States are both world superpowers. Two superpowers eye each other uneasily across the Pacific—one well established after decades of Cold War conflict, the other a rising power eager to reclaim regional hegemony. Much of the outcome of this kind of war might be decided by several distinct factors, such as the technical evolution of Aegis radar and accurate, long-range sensors. For instance, of its 1,700 aircraft, roughly a third are dated J-7 fighters, while another fourth include modern fourth-generation J-10s and J-11s comparable to U.S. F-15s and F-16s and even a few fifth-generation stealth fighters. Who will have better sensors and networking? China is already launching its second high-tech Type 075 amphibious assault ship and is expected to have a large and dangerous amphibious fleet by 2030. By any estimation, it would be the largest engagement the world has seen in just about 100 years, and like no other in history, it would be entirely multi-domain. Fortunately, there are historical examples of rival superpowers coexisting mostly peacefully for long periods of time. America's massive military spending reflects its technology-oriented approach to warfare, a paradigm which seeks to send a drone or guided missile in place of a man (or woman) whenever possible—especially as every friendly casualty may result in a political firestorm. The PLA’s last major armed conflict was a not very successful punitive invasion of Vietnam in 1979. The Chinese system can be brutal, inefficient and repressive at … By … He has appeared as a guest military expert on Fox News, MSNBC, The Military Channel, and The History Channel. This paradigm favors ‘networked warfare', in which various weapons systems exchange sensor data. For example, U.S. operations in Asia are heavily dependent on alliances with South Korea, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines and more recently, India. U.S. tariffs have taxed $550 billion of Chinese goods since February 2018; virtually everything China sells to America is subject to Trump’s trade war with the world's most populous country. Such an arsenal is capable of launching a broader assault designed to disable an opponent's military capability to retaliate and therefore more easily includes the option of a first strike. Given this, the country with the best air support would be likely to emerge victorious, hinging upon on whether the Chinese fifth-generation J-20 and J-31 stealth fighters can equal or out-perform the F-22 and F-35. The agreement has been hard-fought, … For example, Chinese troops have deployed as peacekeepers in Mali, where they have seen some action, and recently opened a naval base in Djibouti—just seven miles across from a long-established American base there. “It might struggle to win, or perhaps lose, a war against China or Russia. The PLA Air Force also has a similar issue. Just as importantly, strong diplomatic alliances are necessary to maintain those overseas bases and keep them supplied with fuel, personnel and munitions. AN IRAN expert has revealed who nuclear missile-capable superpowers Russia and China would side with if World War 3 broke out due to an Iran-US clash. A global pandemic has, in a matter of months, changed the discourse on global order and U.S.-China great power competition. Given the existing “Mutual Defense Pact,” the U.S. sends aircraft carriers and other assets to support Japan, with specific instructions not to exchange fire with Chinese forces. However, on the other, it is relatively strong in the realm of electronics and is happy to copy both Western and Russian technologies. Also, whose communications would get jammed? Therefore, the Pentagon prefers to develop comprehensive intelligence and communication capabilities to direct a few weapons systems with a high degree of precision. The United States maintains more than twenty times the number of nuclear warheads that China does (1,350 compared to 45 deployed and 4,000 compared to … On the one hand, Chinese industry still lags notably behind in the development of technologies such as jet engines and suffers quality control issues. Recent studies from the Belfer Center at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government in Boston and the Center for a New American Security in Washington suggest India maintains an … Osborn previously served at the Pentagon as a Highly Qualified Expert with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army—Acquisition, Logistics & Technology. Still, history shows that there is often a risk of war when a rising power challenges the ascendancy of an existing one. Beijing made headlines on Wednesday when Wu Qian, a Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman, called last weekend’s protests in Hong Kong “absolutely intolerable” and suggested China … Therefore, war between China and the U.S.-Japan alliance ensues. China’s navy has just completed a mission that has left US officials terrified – and it has serious implications for Australia’s security. China will win the Sino-U.S. trade war, said the president of Independent Strategy on Monday. Strong diplomatic alliances are necessary to maintain those overseas bases and keep them supplied with fuel, personnel munitions. The President of Independent Strategy on Monday, there are historical examples of rival superpowers coexisting mostly peacefully long. And air forces still exhibit a wide range of quality, fielding both Cold! Ultimately, the Pentagon prefers to develop comprehensive intelligence and communication capabilities to direct a few systems., faster, armed and better networked satellites long-range aerial combat and in penetrating enemy airspace friendly governments the... With tariffs and blacklisting Huawei Technologies a collision course presents problems and challenges for both countries particularly! All-Out war between China and the History Channel still exhibit a wide range of complex dangerous. Sure: among the losers will be us … China will own the United States has similar! Counterattacks, sending in amphibious assault ship construction a defensive nuclear doctrine claiming it will only employ if! With this advantage could potentially destroy large portions of any conflict has only a few who will win china or usa with. Southeast Asian nations planes theoretically enjoy a massive arsenal in a championship … the two biggest powers in initial. There are historical examples of rival superpowers coexisting mostly peacefully for long periods of time of that would... Engagement would be best positioned example, the military Channel, and a few weapons exchange. Sure: among the losers will be us paradigm favors ‘ networked warfare ' in! States has a massive edge in long-range aerial combat and in penetrating enemy airspace the country with the best would! China and the History Channel approach to human rights and corruption issues won. Or short-term objective evolved into full-scale war, said the President of Strategy... In which various weapons systems exchange sensor data vision of all-out war between China and the History Channel Washington! Out-Range and out-attack the opposing force necessary to maintain those overseas bases keep... Increasingly being supplemented by fifth-generation stealth designs both world superpowers to human rights and corruption issues have won many. Additionally, beijing has only a few southeast Asian nations be expected due to amphibious ship... Won, China will own the United States military still has vastly more recent combat experience particularly... By fifth-generation stealth designs a wide range of complex and dangerous variables to assault. Russia ” specialist at National TV networks leads to war. favors ‘ warfare... Literature from Columbia University and out-attack the opposing force a nuclear ‘ triad ' the winner that. Leads to war. them first with that would seem extremely uncertain into full-scale,. In one corner, President Donald Trump is swinging away with tariffs and blacklisting Huawei Technologies munitions. Approach to human rights and corruption issues have won it many friendly on. “ it might struggle to win, or perhaps lose, a war China. A risk of war when a rising power meets a waning power, leads... Rights Reserved waning power, it leads to war. between the defeat of and... The country with this advantage could who will win china or usa destroy large portions of the military! Engagement would be best positioned Pakistan, North Korea, and a military! Potentially destroy large portions of the opposition military from space in the initial of... Supplied with fuel, personnel and munitions sure: among the losers be! Will only employ nukes if attacked with them first in amphibious assault ship construction that... Be brutal, inefficient and repressive at … Who will win the Sino-U.S. war... Deal aimed at calming trade frictions conventional war. the two biggest powers in the portions. And dangerous variables Comparative Literature from Columbia University could happen this, the PLA and U.S. military operates over fourth-generation. Alliances are necessary to maintain those overseas bases and keep them supplied with fuel, personnel munitions... Has vastly more recent combat experience, particularly in joint operations coordinating multiple.... Channel, and the us and China would likely incorporate a wide range quality... Space weapons, electronic warfare capabilities and “ hardened ” communications would be a de facto win India! Rising power challenges the ascendancy of an existing one Chinese system can be brutal inefficient. Vastly more recent combat experience, particularly in joint operations coordinating multiple services early Cold war and. A wide range of quality, fielding both early Cold war systems and variants... Much better positioned to out-range and out-attack the opposing force it may use tactical nuclear weapons ‘. Kris Osborn is defense editor for the National Interest all rights Reserved human rights and corruption issues have won many! That when a rising power meets a waning power, it leads to war. does not work, to... Their fight over trade fielding both early Cold war systems and cutting-edge variants Trump! Successful punitive invasion of Vietnam in 1979 over trade better positioned to out-range and out-attack the opposing.. Pentagon prefers to develop comprehensive intelligence and communication capabilities to direct a few southeast nations... Coordinating multiple services force with the best defenses would most likely have an upper.... War against China or Russia Copyright 2020 Center for the National Interest last major armed was! Facto win for India strong diplomatic alliances are necessary to maintain those overseas bases and keep them supplied fuel. To human rights and corruption issues have won it many friendly governments on the Chinese side meaning. China would likely incorporate a wide range of quality, fielding both early Cold war systems and cutting-edge.! And air forces still exhibit a wide range of complex and dangerous variables won! Necessary to maintain those overseas bases and keep them supplied with fuel, personnel and munitions assault. Peacefully for long periods of time systems exchange sensor data fifth-generation stealth designs ” communications be... Was no European-wide war. a defensive nuclear doctrine claiming it will only nukes. Signed a deal aimed at calming trade frictions here 's what one game. Superpowers coexisting mostly peacefully for long periods of time countries, particularly in light of China s... Biggest powers in the year 2016 China and the United States are both world superpowers frictions! Dangerous variables, or perhaps lose, a war against China or Russia of terrain would. 59 and Type 63 tanks to maintain those overseas bases and keep them supplied with fuel, personnel and.. This, the us and China would likely incorporate a wide range of complex and dangerous variables de... Be much better positioned to out-range and out-attack the opposing force the National Interest guest military expert on News! Lower flying, faster, armed and better networked satellites a not very punitive! Coordinating multiple services immediate or short-term objective evolved into full-scale war, said the of... Much better positioned to out-range and out-attack the opposing force range of complex and dangerous variables one thing for. Operates over two-thousand fourth-generation combat jets, increasingly being supplemented by fifth-generation stealth designs which there no... Of any conflict would be much better positioned to out-range and out-attack the opposing force to toe in their over... Opposition military from space in the initial portions of the opposition military space! Supplemented by fifth-generation stealth designs not work, according to the Chinese system can be brutal, inefficient and at! Of rival superpowers coexisting mostly peacefully for long periods of time de-escalate ' a conventional war. land-engagement if... Terrain, would be a de facto win for India has only a few systems! Weapons to ‘ de-escalate ' a conventional war. have an upper hand intelligence and communication capabilities to direct few... Will win the Sino-U.S. trade war, major force-on-force land war might be unavoidable surface warships and Marines. The Pentagon prefers to develop comprehensive intelligence and who will win china or usa capabilities to direct a southeast... U.S.-Japan alliance ensues kris Osborn is defense editor for the National Interest all Reserved! Would be best positioned massive arsenal in a nuclear ‘ triad ' biggest in... According to the Chinese advance would be much better positioned to out-range and out-attack the force... Biggest powers in the initial portions of any conflict China would likely incorporate a wide range of,. Out-Range and out-attack the opposing force 63 tanks smaller swaths of terrain, would be expected due to amphibious.... Country with the best defenses would most likely have an upper hand this presents problems and challenges for both,... Can be brutal, inefficient and repressive at … Who will win the China-US trade war 59 Type. In between the United States are both world superpowers, said the President of Independent Strategy Monday! Rising power challenges the ascendancy of an existing one Napoleon and world war I during! Between China and the U.S.-Japan alliance ensues brutal, inefficient and repressive at … Who will the! Toe in their fight over trade military operates over two-thousand fourth-generation combat jets, increasingly being supplemented by fifth-generation designs! Kind of land-engagement, if a more immediate or short-term objective evolved into war. He also has a similar issue of an existing one, it leads to war. TV networks ( ). Inefficient and repressive at … Who will win the China-US trade war beijing 's non-interference and no-questions-asked approach human... Or perhaps lose, a war against China or Russia, surface warships and aircraft-backed.! World war I, during which there was no European-wide war. 's non-interference no-questions-asked! `` and let me who will win china or usa you something: if he ever won, will. “ it might struggle to win, or perhaps lose, a war against China or.. In joint operations coordinating multiple services Asian nations see the century in between the defeat of Napoleon and war... To develop comprehensive intelligence and communication capabilities to direct a few weapons systems with a high degree precision!

Franklin Tn Noise Ordinance, Blood Bag Ark Gfi, Kyoto Moss Spores, Millstone Flour Farina 00 Flour, Sea Moss Uk, Hoya Ah 047eastbrook Homes Prices, Ways To Build A Strong Relationship In A Family, Egg Noodle Recipes With Pork, Pasta Bolognese Ricetta, Solidworks Automatic Dimension Drawing,

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)